Best Food

Everyone eats everyone has an opinion about food. But if health is the goal, mere opinion does not count, or mode or rule majority.

Most people think that the average diet of cooking on the base of the pyramid of official food is very good. Others feed on especially fast food. Others advocate veganism (only plant foods), or lacto-ova vegetarian (milk and egg plants). There are also Special food proponents, such as fresh juices, soy products and beans and rice cooked macrobiotic.

Anyone can make claims on behalf of their beliefs. You can cite examples of people who have escaped the disease and live longer. Some argue the morality and ethics, like those who say that the life of Live animals must not be slaughtered for food. Others set their eating habits according to the rules of the sacred text to avoid certain types of food and sanctify others. Others just eat what tastes good and logic is enough for them.

Eating beliefs seem to be an almost religious. People feel protected and jealous enough food and are not like others to intervene. But since health is closely related to what we have in our mouth, thought, reflection honest and willingness to change are in order.

It is easy to make mistakes due to poor food choices can not show their impact until late in life. Nutrition can pass through even genetically to future generations. In this sense, ideas are also foods such as religion in hundreds of different sects may have each claim of truth. But none of them fear no rebuttal as arbitration before everyone is dead and buried beyond.

The body is extremely adaptable and will survive in any given thing. If food is wrong is usually not immediate harm. However, the body eventually more stressed beyond their capacity to adapt, that causes the disease, the degeneration and loss of vitality. Unfortunately, these consequences are so distant in time diet has caused little understanding of the relationship.

If caution before subscribing to the demands bold in what is or is not good to eat. The real test some idea of health is too far in the future. Our best hope is then to be philosophically well founded before they dragged their feet on table.

How we can develop a philosophy of healthy eating and order all ideas that eating competition? I will explain here a very simple principle is so reasonable, you should not even look for evidence. Follow me and see if you agree.

Consider the following three premises:
1. Like a tree is genetically adapted to absorb certain nutrients from the soil, and a lion is genetically adapted to thrive in the dam, and a deer is genetically adapted to browse on vegetation, so are humans genetically appropriate for certain types of food.
2. Most foods that are currently on display are a product of agricultural and industrial revolution and occupy a small part of the genetic history of humans. (See both the 276-mile line which only a few centimeters represent the dietary habits of industrial type.)
3. The natural, genetically adapted to food for human beings must forelegs. In other words, how could humans exist before the food needed to survive there? We were fully developed agriculture before that any method of food processing. This means that whatever food was eaten archetype for the perfect diet, because food was responsible the existence and development of the incredibly complex human organism. This scheme was the environment, the environmental nutritional womb, if you will, of which we have grown.

If you think these three premises, the logical conclusion derived is that the best food for humans is that the food would be able to eat as is, because it is in nature.

Our fabrics are designed to be bathed in nutrients in food from natural food of life and not dyes, preservatives, synthetic materials, sterile nutrient starches and refined sugars and oils. Do not get me wrong, if you do not eat according to this principle, our bodies are in constant deficit the imbalance and exposure to the toxin. The result of generations to ignore this principle is an epidemic of obesity, chronic degenerative diseases and depletion of our process of digestion.

A feature of all natural foods, it is believed that – in life if you wish. This is consistent with the law of biogenesis, which states that life can only come from preexisting life. Life begets life. Despite the dreams of scientists on the other hand, we have never observed life emerges from non-life, and have not even been able to create life from non-life in a laboratory. If we eat food of life, improve our own lives. If we eat dead, we become devitalized devitalized food and the dead. While this will not happen all at once, but reserves are exhausted adaptation, we become like the food we eat dead.

Therefore, a fundamental characteristic of our natural diet is to be believed. Yes, even meat, organs, eggs and insects – in the first place. Remember, we are a long time even before the use of fire (much less the microwave oven, stove, oven, grill, fryer or an extruder). diet studies of cultures the past and today revealed that primitive societies ate like their genes and the environment dictated.

We are not suddenly dropped from outer space pans on Earth, parties, and toasters. We started on the forest floor, not a fast food line at a counter. All we had in our physical bodies natural world, like any other creature. Any other organism on Earth eats raw foods just as is found in nature. Do you think that nature is not realize our decision to change all that?

Could tofu eligible? No, because the tofu is found nowhere in nature. Could Porridge eligible? No, because oatmeal is found nowhere in nature. Could hamburgers, French fried carrot cake, pop, cereal breakfast, cereal, canned foods, candy, sports drinks, powders, bodybuilding, vitamins and minerals, mashed potatoes, croissants, bagels, Jolly ranchers, Ding Dong, Cocoa Krispies, No Good, "or Fig Newtons eligible Much? There are a number of them are found as such in nature.

For those of you who now are in a panic (if not a joke) to the idea of eating raw foods, yes, there is the danger of foodborne pathogens. But if you are careful and clean, the risk is much lower than the risk of a life of devitalized processed foods. The natural raw food must be safe or our ancestors would not have survived and we would not exist!

It's election. When faced with a choice, why not opt for the wisdom of nature? Is not strange that we are the only creatures on the planet to cook our food? Not surprisingly, given what we succumb to all imaginable chronic degenerative diseases almost unknown creatures eat natural raw foods?

Just think to be placed in nature to the total absence of modern technology. Ask yourself, I eat … and what could eat? You can eat and digest the fruit, nuts, insects, some plants, honey, worms, larvae, eggs, milk and animal flesh. Son of the nutrients in human nature are capable of digesting without technology (including fire) to intervene. They are, in fact, the same foods that are the backbone of nomadic primitive societies. Only when these foods are scarce not unpleasant, inedible food, like most of the grains and vegetables are cooked and processed to change its taste, neutralize toxins and digestibility higher.

That's where we were. But it has something to do with us today in the era of microwave the 21st century? It has everything to do with us because this is the historical context of the expansion that has served the womb that shaped and defined us. Is this natural space occupied by the most of our history and our genes predominates. It is the incubator in which life on Earth has evolved.

What would have been the predominant food nature? likely prey. Back positioned Look at time in this framework with a family to feed. You would be looking for as many foods high in calories and nutrients can be found. This is not a handful of seed corn, grass or a root. Leaving the herbivores do the course and digestion by the stomach specialist that can convert almost any plant material in protein and fat. While eating. Me neither, but the way it is.

Simple enough right? We eat what nature provides that we can digest. However, this is not explained in books on nutrition, nutritionists and a doctoral graduate without grasping it. It crosses the whole theory, belief, and conjecture. Corresponds to our physical body with our natural food.

Our immersion in modern cooking and food processing was misled. Foods such as cereals, tofu, cabbage and lettuce, which are marketed as health food ultimately unnatural food man in all. These products do not exist in nature, are so rare that it can never be a food preservation, in their raw form or cooked unpleasant and toxic.

For example, raw soybeans contain a variety of chemicals that can retard growth and interfere with digestive enzymes in the body. Eat enough of them and you die. cereal products are the result of modern agriculture and in turn must be unpleasant, indigestible and toxic. In nature there are never enough grains of rice, wheat or barley even make a meal, even if they were edible in their raw form. (Sprouted seeds and grains are an exception to this, because they are indigestible materials first and nutritious.)

Who, if they were really very, very hungry – and the options were available – no eating broccoli, cauliflower or lettuce? These foods are acceptable for cooking or salad made with orders.

Now That creates a kind of dilemma. Knowing that our food is natural and consuming are two different things. We are so acclimated to the modern diet that the idea of eating meat flood, for example, is the most nauseating. However, as demonstrated early (but nutritionally superior) the people, raw meat and organs can be eaten with great nutritional value for humans, and are completely digestible and non-toxic. In some cultures, not even bury to raw meat and let it rot (fermentation) and then eat them with relish. These companies are in robust good health to invade modern food. Then, as a ring of dirty bathrooms, modern degenerative diseases decimate these people to the periphery in contact with modern food.

It would be difficult today to realize the ideal raw food diet, natural. But if the basic principle is to take into account that helps remind us of our origins and appropriate programs genetically adapted to food.

This does not mean processed or cooked foods should be eaten. It simply means that always focus on the genetic capacity of the organism and conduct an optimal health status.

Look around the grocery store (usually in the alleys outside) and consider what can be consumed in its natural state. Increase the proportion of these foods. Processed foods should only be compromising the principles of physics less and are closer to nature as possible. Should be whole foods, packaged with care to protect the nutritional value and free of synthetic materials, refined oils and sugars.

For example, whole milk yogurt, which has not been homogenized or pasteurized is ideal. The same would be the next best pasteurized. The same side pasteurized and homogenized. It would be worse non-fat, pasteurized, homogenized, artificially flavored and sweetened yogurt (which is, of course, what most eat because they taste more like what they were – sweet).

Eat the best food you can find in the variety and moderation and will do better than we can do.

There you have a word, what I took years of research, study and reflection to discover. It is simple and obvious, but is that all great truths.

For more information or for more information on Dr. Wysong and the Wysong Corporation please visit or write to www.wysong.net wysong@wysong.net. For more healthy food resources for people including snacks and breakfast cereals Please visit www.cerealwysong.com.

About the Author

Dr. Wysong: A former veterinary clinician and surgeon, college instructor in human anatomy, physiology and the origin of life, inventor of numerous medical, surgical, nutritional, athletic and fitness products and devices, research director for the present company by his name and founder of the philanthropic Wysong Institute. http://www.wysong.net. Also check out http://www.cerealwysong.com.